Apple AirPods Pro 2 vs HearingAssist Micro

The Apple AirPods Pro 2 is a budget-priced OTC hearing aid that earns an A grade with a SoundScore of 4.1/5 in our lab testing, placing it in the top 26% of OTC hearing aids tested. At $249, it represents one of the more affordable options in the category while delivering strong overall performance. In our testing, the AirPods Pro 2 shows particular strength in speech clarity for quiet environments, scoring 4.2/5—a strong result that sits 1.38 points above the category average. Music streaming is where this device truly excels, earning 4.4/5 and outperforming the category average by a substantial 2.48 points. Feedback handling is excellent at 5.0/5, meaning users should experience virtually no whistling issues. The device does have limitations. Own-voice comfort scores 1.9/5, which is low in absolute terms and 0.61 points below the category average—users may notice their own voice sounds different or boomy. Speech in noise performance is above average for the category at 2.3/5 (+0.77 points), but this remains a mixed result in absolute terms, suggesting challenging listening environments will still be difficult. The AirPods Pro 2 is best suited for consumers already in the Apple ecosystem who want hearing support primarily in quieter settings and value excellent music and media streaming. Those frequently in noisy environments or sensitive to own-voice changes may want to consider alternatives.

The HearingAssist Micro is a premium amplifier in the invisible-in-ear style, priced at $698. In our lab testing, it earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.6/5, placing it #3 among the 8 amplification products we've tested. This device shows a clear strength in speech clarity during quiet environments, scoring 3.5/5—a solid result that sits 1.35 points above the category average of 2.11/5. Feedback handling is also strong at 4.0/5, though slightly below the category average of 4.28/5. Own-voice comfort comes in at 2.8/5, which is above the category average but only mixed in absolute terms. The Micro has notable limitations. Speech-in-noise performance is low at 1.1/5, falling 0.31 points below the category average. Music streaming is where this device struggles most significantly, scoring 0.0/5—well below the already modest category average of 1.16/5. Users who want to stream audio from their phone should look elsewhere. The HearingAssist Micro may suit those prioritizing discreet, invisible-in-ear design and clear speech understanding in quieter settings. However, buyers seeking strong noise management or any music streaming capability should consider alternatives. At this price point, the Sennheiser Conversation Clear Plus offers notably higher overall performance, while options like the iHear MatriX deliver similar sound quality at a lower price.