Apple AirPods Pro 2 vs Eargo 5

The Apple AirPods Pro 2 is a budget-priced OTC hearing aid that earns an A grade with a SoundScore of 4.1/5 in our lab testing, placing it in the top 26% of OTC hearing aids tested. At $249, it represents one of the more affordable options in the category while delivering strong overall performance. In our testing, the AirPods Pro 2 shows particular strength in speech clarity for quiet environments, scoring 4.2/5—a strong result that sits 1.38 points above the category average. Music streaming is where this device truly excels, earning 4.4/5 and outperforming the category average by a substantial 2.48 points. Feedback handling is excellent at 5.0/5, meaning users should experience virtually no whistling issues. The device does have limitations. Own-voice comfort scores 1.9/5, which is low in absolute terms and 0.61 points below the category average—users may notice their own voice sounds different or boomy. Speech in noise performance is above average for the category at 2.3/5 (+0.77 points), but this remains a mixed result in absolute terms, suggesting challenging listening environments will still be difficult. The AirPods Pro 2 is best suited for consumers already in the Apple ecosystem who want hearing support primarily in quieter settings and value excellent music and media streaming. Those frequently in noisy environments or sensitive to own-voice changes may want to consider alternatives.

The Eargo 5 is a premium-priced OTC hearing aid ($1,450) that earns a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.6/5 in our lab testing. This invisible-in-ear device offers a discreet rechargeable design, though its acoustic performance shows notable strengths and weaknesses compared to alternatives in its price range. In our testing, the Eargo 5 demonstrates solid speech-in-quiet performance at 3.5/5, scoring 0.75 points above the OTC category average. Own-voice comfort also measures above average, which may appeal to users sensitive to occlusion effects. However, speech-in-noise performance is low at 1.4/5, and music streaming scores 0.0/5—significantly below the category average of 1.92/5. Users who prioritize phone streaming or frequently encounter noisy environments should consider these limitations. Feedback handling is strong in absolute terms at 4.2/5, though slightly below the category average of 4.54/5. The device uses closed sleeves for ear coupling in both initial and tuned configurations, with minimal score improvement from tuning (3.6 to 3.7/5). At this price point, competitors like the Lucid Tala (4.63/5) and Audicus Omni 2 (4.61/5) offer substantially higher overall sound performance. Budget-conscious shoppers may also find similar or better sound quality from lower-priced options like the Sony CRE-C10. The Eargo 5 may suit users who prioritize invisible cosmetics and quiet-environment listening over streaming and noise performance.