Jabra Enhance Select 700 vs Lucid Ultra 128

The Jabra Enhance Select 700 is a premium-priced OTC hearing aid available at $1,795, earning a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.8/5 in our lab testing. This behind-the-ear device ranks #26 of 65 OTC hearing aids tested, placing it in the top 38% of the category. In our testing, the Enhance Select 700 shows notable strengths in own-voice comfort, scoring 3.7/5—a solid result that sits 1.19 points above the category average. This makes it a comfortable choice for users sensitive to the "hollow" sound of their own voice that some hearing aids produce. Feedback handling is excellent at 5.0/5, meaning users can expect stable performance without whistling during typical daily activities. Speech clarity in quiet environments is solid at 3.1/5, coming in 0.27 points above the category average. However, speech understanding in noisy settings is a weakness, scoring just 1.0/5—falling 0.48 points below the category average. Users who frequently encounter restaurants, group gatherings, or other challenging listening environments may find this limitation significant. Music streaming quality is mixed at 2.5/5, though still 0.58 points above the category average. At this price point, buyers should note that several same-priced alternatives deliver stronger overall performance, including the Lucid Tala (4.63/5) and Audicus Omni 2 (4.61/5). The Enhance Select 700 is best suited for users who prioritize own-voice comfort and feedback-free wear over speech-in-noise performance, and who value Jabra's established brand and support ecosystem.

The Lucid Ultra 128 is a premium behind-the-ear prescription hearing aid priced at $5,000, earning an A grade with a SoundScore of 4.4/5 in our lab testing. It ranks #16 of 36 devices in the Prescription Hearing Aid category. Speech performance is a clear strength for the Ultra 128. In our testing, speech in quiet scored a strong 4.3/5, landing 1.03 points above the category average. Speech in noise measured 2.7/5—above the category average by 0.74 points, though mixed in absolute terms. These results suggest the device prioritizes intelligibility in everyday listening situations. The Ultra 128 does show notable weaknesses. Feedback handling scored just 1.7/5, falling 3.01 points below the category average of 4.71/5—a significant gap that prospective buyers should consider. Music streaming measured 2.3/5, slightly below the category average. Own-voice comfort was mixed at 2.9/5, though this sits just above the category norm. The device uses disposable batteries and supports streaming to both iPhone and Android. At this price point, buyers may want to compare against higher-scoring competitors like the Phonak Sphere Infinio (5.0/5) or Oticon Intent (4.85/5). The Lucid Ultra 128 may suit those who prioritize speech clarity in quieter environments and can work with their hearing care provider to manage its feedback limitations.