Jabra Enhance Select 300 vs Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2)

The Jabra Enhance Select 300 is a premium OTC hearing aid priced at $1,695 that earns an A grade with a SoundScore of 4.1/5 in our lab testing. This behind-the-ear device ranks #17 among 65 OTC hearing aids tested, placing it in the top 25% of its category. In our testing, the Enhance Select 300 demonstrates notable strengths in speech clarity for quiet environments, scoring 0.85 points above the OTC category average. Feedback handling is excellent at 5.0/5, and own-voice comfort scores a solid 3.5/5—nearly a full point above average for the category. Music streaming performance, while above average for OTC devices, remains mixed in absolute terms at 2.6/5. The device's main limitation appears in challenging listening environments. Speech-in-noise performance scored 1.5/5, which is low in absolute terms and essentially matches the category average. Users who frequently encounter noisy restaurants, busy offices, or crowded gatherings may find this a meaningful constraint. The Enhance Select 300 is best suited for individuals who primarily need improved hearing in quieter settings such as home conversations, one-on-one meetings, or watching television. It offers reliable streaming to both iPhone and Android devices, rechargeable batteries, and hands-free functionality. Shoppers seeking stronger noise performance at this price point may want to compare alternatives like the Lucid Tala or Audicus Omni 2, which scored higher overall in our testing.

The Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) is a budget-priced amplification product in the hearing glasses style, earning a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.8/5 in our lab testing. Priced at $375, this device ranks #2 of 8 in the Amplification Product category. In our testing, this product demonstrated exceptional strengths in music streaming quality, scoring 4.3/5—a remarkable 3.14 points above the category average. Own-voice comfort was equally impressive at 4.7/5, exceeding the category average by over 2 points. These results suggest Meta has prioritized the audio experience that their glasses are known for, delivering strong fidelity for streamed content and minimal occlusion-related discomfort. However, speech performance presents a more mixed picture. Speech in quiet scored 2.7/5, which is above the category average by 0.62 points but only mixed in absolute terms. Speech in noise measured 1.6/5—still above average for the category, but low overall. The most notable weakness is feedback handling at 1.9/5, falling 2.38 points below the category average. The Meta Ray-Ban Glasses (Gen 2) are best suited for users who prioritize music streaming quality and comfort over maximum speech clarity. Those seeking amplification primarily for challenging listening environments may want to consider alternatives with stronger speech-in-noise performance.