Jabra Enhance Select 200 vs Linner Mercury

The Jabra Enhance Select 200 is a premium-priced OTC hearing aid that earns a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.9/5 in our lab testing, ranking in the top 35% of OTC devices. At $1,695, it sits at the higher end of the OTC market and has earned HearAdvisor's Expert's Choice Award in both 2023 and 2024. This behind-the-ear device delivers its strongest performance in speech clarity during quiet environments, scoring 3.5/5—a solid result that sits 0.67 points above the OTC category average. Own-voice comfort is another highlight at 3.4/5, which is 0.89 points above average, meaning wearers are less likely to experience the bothersome "talking in a barrel" sensation. Music streaming scores 2.6/5, which is 0.68 points above the category average, though still mixed in absolute terms. The device shows some limitations in challenging listening situations. Speech in noise performance is low at 1.4/5, sitting slightly below the category average. Feedback handling scores a strong 4.0/5 in absolute terms, though this falls 0.54 points below the OTC average of 4.54/5. The Enhance Select 200 includes modern conveniences like rechargeable batteries and streaming compatibility with both iPhone and Android devices, plus hands-free calling capability. However, budget-conscious shoppers should note that several devices in this price range—including the Lucid Tala and Audicus Omni 2—achieve higher scores, and alternatives like the Lucid Engage offer similar sound quality at lower prices. This device is best suited for listeners who prioritize clear speech in quieter settings and natural own-voice quality over performance in noisy environments.

The Linner Mercury is a budget-priced OTC hearing aid that earns a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.1/5 in our lab testing. Priced at $387, it ranks #60 of 65 devices in the OTC Hearing Aid category, placing it in the top 91% of the category. In our testing, the Mercury shows a mixed performance profile. Its standout strength is excellent feedback handling at 4.7/5, which is 0.16 points above the category average—meaning users are unlikely to experience whistling or squealing during normal use. However, speech clarity metrics fall below category norms: speech in quiet scores 2.2/5 (0.62 points below average), and speech in noise scores a low 1.0/5 (0.48 points below average). Own-voice comfort also scores low at 1.6/5, sitting 0.91 points below the category average. Music streaming is a notable weakness, scoring 0.0/5—a full 1.92 points below the category average. Users who prioritize streaming audio from their phone should consider alternatives. The device uses a rechargeable battery and features a visible in-ear design with power dome coupling. At this price point, several competitors offer stronger overall performance. The Linner Mercury may appeal to budget-conscious consumers who prioritize feedback-free operation over speech clarity and streaming quality, but those seeking better speech understanding in challenging environments should explore higher-scoring options in this price range.