Hear.com Horizon Go IX vs Signia Silk Charge&Go IX

The Hear.com Horizon Go IX is a premium prescription behind-the-ear hearing aid released in 2024, priced at $6,500. In HearAdvisor's lab testing, it earned an A grade with a SoundScore of 4.4/5, ranking #19 among 39 prescription hearing aids tested. Speech performance is a clear strength for the Horizon Go IX. It scores 4.0/5 in speech-in-quiet conditions—0.64 points above the category average—delivering strong audibility in conversational settings. Speech-in-noise performance also exceeds the category average by 0.46 points, though at 2.6/5 the absolute score remains mixed, meaning challenging listening environments may still pose difficulties. Own-voice comfort is the device's most notable weakness, scoring just 1.8/5—a low result that falls 0.90 points below the category average. Users sensitive to how their own voice sounds may find this limiting. Feedback handling scores 4.4/5, which is strong in absolute terms, though slightly below the category average of 4.72/5. Music streaming performance is essentially average at 2.7/5. At this price point, shoppers face stiff competition. Several alternatives in the same premium tier—including the Phonak Sphere Infinio, Oticon Intent, and Widex Allure RIC 440—deliver higher overall scores. Devices like the Rexton Reach R-Li T80 at Costco offer comparable or better sound performance at lower prices. The Horizon Go IX is best suited for users who prioritize speech clarity and have access to this product through hear.com's network, but those flexible on brand should compare alternatives before committing.

The Signia Silk Charge&Go IX is a premium prescription hearing aid featuring an invisible-in-ear design, currently available at $3,298. In HearAdvisor's lab testing, it earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.7/5, ranking #32 of 39 prescription hearing aids tested. This device demonstrates a notable strength in speech clarity for quiet environments, scoring an excellent 4.6/5—well above the category average by 1.22 points. Speech in noise performance is mixed at 2.2/5, though this still edges slightly above the category average. Feedback handling is strong at 4.3/5, providing reliable stability during typical wear, even if it falls just below the category average. The Silk Charge&Go IX has significant limitations to consider. Own-voice comfort scores low at 1.5/5, falling 1.20 points below the category average—a trade-off that may relate to the invisible form factor. Most notably, the device does not support music streaming, scoring 0.0/5 in that metric, which is 2.76 points below the category average. At this premium price point, several competitors deliver substantially higher overall performance, including the Phonak Sphere Infinio (4.98/5) and Oticon Intent (4.83/5). The Silk Charge&Go IX is best suited for users who prioritize an invisible, rechargeable design and primarily need clear speech understanding in quieter settings, while having minimal need for streaming audio content.