Back to Leaderboard
Product Comparison
Hear.com Horizon Go IX vs Signia Silk Charge&Go IX
Side-by-side HearAdvisor lab results with SoundGrades, expert pick badges, and the same visualizations we use in product reviews.
Uses Official HearAdvisor Lab Data
We independently review each item we recommend and appreciate your trust and support. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission. Learn More.
Performance metrics
Scale 1-5 (Tuned)
Lab metric by fit
Speech in quiet
Hear.com Horizon Go IX4.0
Signia Silk Charge&Go IX4.5
Speech in noise
Hear.com Horizon Go IX2.7
Signia Silk Charge&Go IX2.6
Own voice
Hear.com Horizon Go IX1.8
Signia Silk Charge&Go IX1.5
Feedback handling
Hear.com Horizon Go IX4.4
Signia Silk Charge&Go IX4.3
Music streaming
Hear.com Horizon Go IX2.7
Signia Silk Charge&Go IX0.0
Speech level
Adjust input dB (Tuned)
Amplification (REIG)
Insertion gain at 65 dB (Tuned)
Fitting configuration for tuned fit
Hear.com Horizon Go IXSignia Silk Charge&Go IX
Ear CouplingSleeve Closed
Ear CouplingTulip Dome
Receiver119/16
Receiver–
Fitting FormulaNAL-NL2
Fitting Formula–
Listening ProgramUniversal (Automatic)
Listening Program–
Volume SettingAdjusted to match NAL-NL2 targets at 55, 65, and 75 dB SPL
Volume Setting–
Software VersionSoftware v9.11.15.112, SiFit v9.11.15.948
Software Version–
Tuning AdjustmentsProgrammed to N3 audiogram, Feedback calibrated, Experience Level set at "Experienced", Acclimatization Level set at 100%, Other settings at manufacturer defaults
Tuning Adjustments–
Notesn/a
Notes–