Apple AirPods Pro 3 vs Eargo 5

The Apple AirPods Pro 3 is a budget-priced OTC hearing aid available at $250, earning a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.3/5 in our lab testing. This visible-in-ear device ranks #49 of 65 OTC hearing aids tested, placing it in the top 74% of its category. The standout performance area is music streaming, scoring a strong 4.3/5—a full 2.38 points above the category average. Feedback handling is excellent at 5.0/5, meaning users can expect stable performance without whistling during normal use. However, speech performance presents a more mixed picture: speech in quiet scores 2.3/5, falling 0.53 points below the category average, while speech in noise scores 1.8/5—above the category average but low in absolute terms. Own-voice comfort is a notable weakness at 1.9/5, scoring 0.61 points below the category average, which may affect how natural your own speech sounds while wearing the devices. The product showed meaningful improvement from tuning, with the normalized score rising from 3.2/5 to 3.8/5 after adjustment. The AirPods Pro 3 is best suited for users who prioritize music streaming quality and seamless Apple ecosystem integration over maximum speech clarity. Budget-conscious shoppers should note that several competitors in the same price range—including the Elehear Beyond and the previous-generation Apple AirPods Pro 2—achieved higher overall scores in our testing.

The Eargo 5 is a premium-priced OTC hearing aid ($1,450) featuring an invisible-in-ear design with rechargeable batteries. In our lab testing, it earned a B grade with a SoundScore of 3.6/5, placing it in the top 52% of the OTC hearing aid category. This device demonstrates solid performance for speech understanding in quiet environments, scoring 3.5/5—0.75 points above the category average of 2.79/5. Own-voice comfort also measures above average at 2.8/5 (+0.29 vs category), though this remains mixed in absolute terms. Feedback handling is strong at 4.2/5, providing reliable stability during wear. However, the Eargo 5 shows notable limitations in other areas. Speech in noise performance is low at 1.4/5, slightly below the category average. Most significantly, music streaming scored 0.0/5, falling 1.92 points below the category average—this device does not support audio streaming functionality. The invisible-in-ear form factor appeals to users prioritizing discretion, and the closed sleeve coupling remains consistent between initial and tuned fits. Tuning provided modest improvement, moving from a normalized Initial Score of 3.5/5 to a Tuned Score of 3.7/5. Given its premium price point, consumers may want to compare against alternatives like the Sony CRE-C10 or Nuance Audio Glasses, which offer similar or better sound performance at lower price points. The Eargo 5 is best suited for users who prioritize cosmetic discretion and primarily need help with speech in quieter settings.